Increasing the use of mediation in the civil justice system – a cautionary tale

Nicola Critchley of DWF looks at how the response to the Ministry of Justice’s proposal for automatic mediation in all Small Claims Track cases urges caution, warning that mandatory mediation could lead to unnecessary delays, increased costs, and inefficiencies—particularly where parties are already using effective ADR methods or require judicial decisions. It emphasises that while mediation has value, especially in disputes between unrepresented parties, justice would be better served by strengthening pre-action protocols, supporting voluntary mediation, and investing in judicial resources to reduce existing case backlogs.

https://dwfgroup.com/en/news-and-insights/insights/2022/10/increasing-the-use-of-mediation-in-the-civil-justice-system

Read More
Does mediation offer the answer to the ever growing family court backlog?

Stevens & Bolton look at how mediation is increasingly endorsed by family lawyers and judges as a preferable alternative to litigation for resolving private law disputes, aiming to ease the burden on the overstretched family courts. With growing court backlogs and enhanced mediation options like shuttle and hybrid mediation, there is hope that more couples will choose these accessible, private solutions to resolve family issues efficiently.

https://viewpoints.stevens-bolton.com/post/102hxqd/does-mediation-offer-the-answer-to-the-ever-growing-family-court-backlog#page=1

Read More
For Dispute Resolution, Consider a Lawyer Trained as a Mediator

An article from Harvard Law School explores how hiring a lawyer trained as a mediator can lead to more objective advice and better decision-making in disputes, as such lawyers are less prone to biases that often impair judgment in adversarial roles. Research shows that mediation training and de-biasing techniques like considering the opposite and perspective taking help lawyers—and their clients—avoid costly settlement errors and reach more collaborative, effective outcomes.

https://www.pon.harvard.edu/daily/dispute-resolution/negotiation-research-dispute-resolution-consider-lawyer-trained-mediation-nb/?utm_source=WhatCountsEmail&utm_medium=jsweekly&utm_date=2022-08-27-10-00-00&mqsc=W4146584

Read More
CEDR's Complete Guide To Commercial Property Mediation

It covers everything you need to know about mediating in this space, looking specifically at:

Commercial property mediators, Eve Pienaar and Stephen Barker, provide a guide to mediating in the commercial property space, looking at the mediation process, challenges and case studies, who should attend, advice on preparation and negotiation strategy, and settlement considerations.

https://cedr.foleon.com/cedr/cedrs-complete-guide-to-commercial-property-mediation/?utm_campaign=Commercial%20Newsletter&utm_medium=email&_hsmi=221800795&_hsenc=p2ANqtz-8Fz5WHSe5HY_R1dpRK0obHds6UyWkK_ZtzsnNAFQ-1-MS6oZXmfCxun2GM_LlTtgcV8H_mOSk34H3Jw-FJ5fEq_nCHPmGaZJwLojXlUJR4x4XOUJU&utm_content=221800795&utm_source=hs_email

Read More
A "sanction" can be the consequence of an unreasonable refusal to mediate in the Commercial Court

Stevens & Bolton, an independent UK law firm, write that the High Court ruled that while an unreasonable refusal to mediate can be a factor in cost awards, it does not automatically result in severe sanctions, as seen in Paul Richards v Speechly Bircham LLP. The decision highlights the court’s broad discretion in cost assessments, reinforcing that parties should engage in mediation to avoid potential financial consequences but that a refusal alone does not guarantee a punitive outcome.

https://www.stevens-bolton.com/site/insights/articles/a-sanction-can-be-the-consequence-of-an-unreasonable-refusal

Read More
Failure to Mediate: What are the Consequences?

Sheena Sood and Anna Braden of Beale & Co consider the case of Richards & Anor v Speechly Bircham Llp & Anor (Consequential Matters) [2022] EWHC 1512 (Comm) which, although it highlights the importance the Courts put on the parties engaging in mediation, suggests that a failure to engage in mediation is only one of the factors Courts look at when deciding on costs.

https://beale-law.com/article/failure-to-mediate-what-are-the-consequences/

Read More
Wright v Pitfield and Wright [2022] NZHC 385

Section 145 of the Trusts Act 2019 enables the High Court to order that a dispute (as defined) be submitted to mediation (or other ‘ADR process’), provided the terms of the trust do not indicate a contrary intention and the dispute relates to an 'internal matter' (i.e. a matter to which the parties are trustee / beneficiary, or trustee / trustee).

In Wright v Pitfield and Wright [2022] NZHC 385, Venning J decided that s 145 (b) was engaged, the Court had jurisdiction to direct the parties to mediation, and the Court should exercise its discretion to submit the dispute to mediation as, with appropriate assistance, the issues between the parties were  capable of sensible resolution, and there was no good reason not to make the order. Venning J considered S v N [2021] NZHC 2860.

Read More
Terry v Terry [2023] NZHC 884

Section 145 of the Trusts Act 2019 enables the High Court to order that a dispute (as defined) be submitted to mediation (or other ‘ADR process’), provided the terms of the trust do not indicate a contrary intention and the dispute relates to an 'internal matter' (i.e. a matter to which the parties are trustee / beneficiary, or trustee / trustee).

In Terry v Terry [2023] NZHC 884, 21/4/2023, Palmerston North, Johnston AJ decided that the particular circumstances of that case meant there was no realistic prospect of a settlement, and the dispute was not submitted to mediation. The Associate Judge considered the case of Wright v Pitfield [2022] NZHC 385.

Read More